ADVANCING NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION AND DISARMAMENT, AND SECURING THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE COMPREHENSIVE NUCLEAR-TEST-BAN TREATY: THE ROLE OF PARLIAMENTS
Resolution adopted by consensus * by the 120th IPU Assembly 
(Addis Ababa, 10 April 2009)
 
 
The 120th Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union,
 Determined to advance  nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation with a view to strengthening  international peace and security in accordance with the principles of the  Charter of the United Nations, and underscoring that substantial progress in the field of nuclear disarmament requires  active support and dedicated contributions by all States, 
Deeply  concerned that  the existence in the world  of  some 26,000 nuclear weapons, whose use can  have devastating human, environmental and economic consequences, constitutes a threat to international peace and  security,  
Reaffirming the obligations of nuclear-weapon States under Article VI of the Treaty on the  Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) towards nuclear disarmament and their unequivocal undertakings  under the 1995 and 2000 NPT Review Conferences in this regard, 
Recalling past IPU  resolutions designed to advance the progress of non-proliferation and  disarmament and to encourage ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban  Treaty (CTBT), in particular the one adopted by the 101st Inter-Parliamentary  Conference (Brussels, April 1999), 
Reaffirming the crucial  importance of the NPT as the cornerstone of the nuclear non-proliferation and  disarmament regime, which sets out legal obligations in these fields at the  same time as it guarantees the  right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, 
Recalling international  conventions and resolutions adopted by the UN Security Council and the IPU on  the right to access nuclear technology for peaceful purposes,  
Concerned that  non-compliance with all provisions of the NPT by some States has undermined the  three pillars of the NPT and eroded the benefits derived by all States, 
Considering the  importance of all States ensuring strict compliance with their nuclear  non-proliferation and disarmament obligations, 
Recognizing the progress  made under the NPT and the resulting safeguards agreements, and urging the nuclear-weapon States to fully implement the commitments they undertook  during the NPT Review Conferences in 1995 and 2000, 
Concerned that, in spite  of tireless efforts made by the international community for forty years to ban  nuclear explosions in all environments, and thirteen years after it was opened  for signature, the CTBT has yet to enter into force, 
Convinced that the  verified cessation of nuclear-weapon-test explosions or any other nuclear  explosions constitutes an effective disarmament and non-proliferation measure  and is a meaningful preliminary step towards nuclear disarmament, but stressing that the only way to remove the threat of nuclear weapons is the total  elimination of such inhumane weapons, 
Stressing that  a universal and effectively verifiable CTBT constitutes a fundamental instrument  in the field of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, 
Underscoring the  crucial role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in promoting  nuclear cooperation, the transfer of nuclear technology for peaceful purposes  to developing countries, and nuclear non-proliferation, and the need for every  State to adopt the non-proliferation safeguards standard of a comprehensive  safeguards agreement combined with an additional protocol,  
Disappointed that after  over a decade, the Conference on Disarmament, the UN multilateral disarmament  negotiation body, has yet to agree on a programme of work and resume its  important mandate, owing to the divergent views on disarmament negotiation  priorities, 
Considering the  important role played by bilateral disarmament treaties, such as the Strategic  Arms Reduction Treaty, welcoming the  cuts made by some nuclear-weapon States to their nuclear arsenals and urging deeper, faster and irreversible  cuts to all types of nuclear weapons by all nuclear-armed States, 
Convinced that the best  way to guarantee world peace and stability is to take effective measures for  international security, including disarmament and the non-proliferation of  nuclear weapons,  
Recognizing the  benefits of confidence-building measures, such as the de-emphasizing of nuclear  weapons in national security doctrines and the removal of nuclear weapons  systems from high alert status, and mindful of the mutual confidence engendered by freely agreed regional nuclear-weapon-free  zones, such as those in the South Pacific, Africa, South-East Asia and Latin  America, 
Underscoring the  importance of establishing a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Middle   East, without exception, 
Deeply concerned by the  risk of accidental or unauthorized use of nuclear weapons and by the resulting  toll in human life, environmental damage, political tensions, economic loss and  market instability, 
Pledging to bring about  fuller parliamentary involvement in the disarmament process, particularly in  respect of nuclear weapons, in the form of greater pressure on governments and  detailed scrutiny of military budgets and procurement programmes allocated for  nuclear weapons development, 
Mindful of the fact that national defence  policies should not compromise the fundamental principle of undiminished  security for all, and thus recalling that any unilateral deployment or build-up of strategic anti-ballistic missile  assets affecting the deterrent capacity of nuclear-weapon States might hinder  the process of nuclear disarmament,  
- Calls on all nuclear-armed States to make  deeper, faster and irreversible cuts to all types of nuclear weapons;
 
 - Urges all States to redouble  their efforts to prevent and combat the proliferation of nuclear and other  weapons of mass destruction in accordance with international law;
 
 - Underscores the vital role of the CTBT  as part of a framework for achieving nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament,  and expresses disappointment that, thirteen years after it was opened for  signature, the Treaty has yet to enter into force;
 
 - Stresses the vital importance and  urgency of signature and ratification, without delay and without conditions, to  achieve the earliest entry into force of the CTBT;
 
 - Welcomes the  signatures/ratifications of the CTBT in 2008 by Barbados,  Burundi, Colombia, Lebanon,  Malawi, Malaysia, Mozambique and Timor-Leste;
 
 - Calls upon the  parliaments of all States that have not yet signed and ratified the CTBT to  exert pressure on their governments to do so;
 
 - Especially urges parliaments of all  remaining States listed in Annex 2 of the CTBT, whose ratification is required  to bring the treaty into force, to urge their governments to immediately sign  and ratify the treaty;
 
 - Calls on all  nuclear-armed States to continue to observe their moratoria on nuclear-weapon  testing, on all States that have not already done so to proceed, on a voluntary  basis, to dismantle their nuclear test sites, and on all States to maintain  support for the CTBT Organization verification system until the CTBT enters  into force;
 
 - Urges immediate commencement of  negotiations on a non-discriminatory, multilateral and internationally  verifiable treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear  weapons and other nuclear explosive devices;
 
 - Invites States to initiate negotiations with a view to concluding a treaty on the  prohibition of short-range and intermediate-range land missiles that carry  nuclear warheads;
 
 - Recommends that States with ballistic missile capacity that have not acceded to the Hague  Code of Conduct do so quickly in order to render this instrument completely  effective against ballistic missile proliferation;
 
 - Calls on all nuclear-armed States  to adopt confidence-building measures, including the de-emphasizing of nuclear  weapons in national security doctrines and the removal of all nuclear weapons  from high alert status;
 
 - Reaffirms the importance of  achieving universal accession to the NPT, and of States not party to the NPT  acceding to it promptly and unconditionally as non-nuclear-weapon States, and  of all States party to the NPT fulfilling their obligations under the Treaty;
 
 - Is hopeful that the States  concerned will be required to sign and comply with safeguards agreements and  additional protocols, in particular those concluded in the framework of the  IAEA, as a prerequisite for benefiting from international cooperation in the  field of nuclear energy for civilian purposes;
 
 - Calls on all States to support the  initiatives aimed at globalizing the obligations set forth in the Treaty signed  between the United States and the former Soviet Union on the elimination of  their intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles (INF Treaty) and to promote  cooperative approaches to the issue of missile defence, beginning with a joint  assessment of possible threats;
 
 - Calls on national  parliaments to ensure State compliance with all their disarmament and  non-proliferation obligations;
 
 - Urges parliaments to provide strong and  effective support to all resolutions and recommendations on peace, disarmament  and security previously adopted at IPU Conferences and Assemblies;
 
 - Encourages parliaments to monitor  closely national implementation of all arms control, non-proliferation and  disarmament treaties and UN resolutions, to engage their publics on nuclear  issues and to report back to the IPU on progress made;
 
 - Urges IAEA Member   States or parties to a  safeguards agreement to lend strong and constant support to the IAEA so that it  can honour its safeguards obligations and therefore to cooperate in good faith  with the IAEA by providing it with all information requested;
 
 - Calls on States whose ratification  is needed for the entry into force of general safeguards agreements to take the  necessary steps to that end as soon as possible;
 
 - Further calls on the States party to  a safeguards agreement which have not yet signed and/or ratified an additional  protocol to do so as soon as possible;
 
 - Recommends that the United Nations,  especially the Office of Disarmament Affairs, and  the Preparatory Commission for the CTBT Organization, strengthen cooperation  with the IPU;
 
 - Invites the IPU Secretary General  to contact, on an annual basis, the parliaments of the States which have not  signed and/or ratified the international treaties mentioned in the present  resolution with a view to encouraging them to do so;
 
 - Urges parliaments to instruct  governments to express their support for the UN Secretary-General’s Five Point  Proposal contained in his address, "The United Nations and Security in a  Nuclear-Weapon-Free World";
 
 - Encourages parliaments to support  the full ratification and implementation of existing nuclear-weapon-free zones,  and to explore the possibility of establishing additional nuclear-weapon-free  zones freely agreed by States in specific regions;
 
 - Calls for the necessary steps to be  taken to declare the Middle East a nuclear-weapon-free zone, without exception,  in keeping with the resolution endorsed by the NPT Review Conference in 1995;
 
 - Encourages all parliaments to remain  seized of the issue at the highest political level and, where possible, to  promote compliance with the NPT through bilateral and joint outreach, seminars  and other means.
 
 
* The following delegations expressed reservations on parts of the resolution: 
  -	China - operative paragraphs 10, 11 and 15; 
  -	India - preambular paragraphs 4, 5, 7, 10 and 12 and operative paragraphs 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 13; 
  -	Iran (Islamic Republic of) - preambular paragraph 18 and operative paragraphs 6, 10, 21 and 26; 
  -	Pakistan - preambular paragraphs 7 and 13 and operative paragraphs 13, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 23.
 
 
 
HOME PAGE IPU ASSEMBLY MAIN AREAS OF ACTIVITY IPU STRUCTURE AND DOCUMENTS
 |